Are you in or near Australia in October and November? Then you’re in for a treat. We have two technical writing conferences in a row, within a stone’s throw of each other. Well, for some definition of “stone’s throw”, anyway. 😉
First up is the annual conference of the Australian Society for Technical Communication, which takes place in Surfers Paradise on 12-13 October. The conference theme is Let’s get technical, technical. Learn about CSS smart selectors, rethinking DITA, speeding up your web pages, blockchain, impossible docs, becoming an efficient writer, Simplified Technical English, and more. Follow up with a focused workshop on web coding. Check the list of presentations and fill in the registration form.
Next up is the Write the Docs AU conference in Melbourne on 15-16 November. This is the second WtD AU conference ever, following on from last year’s debut. This event offers a mix of presentations, lightning talks, workshops, and unconference sessions. Check out the schedule and get a ticket.
Found on a walk in the bush – patterns on the bottom of a squashed mushroom. Intriguing:
This app makes it easy for me to move GitHub issues from one repository to another within the same GitHub org. I’ve just used it for the first time. It’s a real time saver. And it’s pretty too, especially if you’re fond of ladybirds.
The Issue Mover for GitHub:
What problem does the app solve? Let’s say you belong to an organisation on GitHub with a number of repositories. The number of repos has grown over the months and years, as it inevitably does. As a result, you frequently find yourself needing to move issues from one repo to another. It’s time-consuming to do that by hand. You need to copy across all the content of and comments from each issue, reassign each issue to the relevant contributor, add back all the labels, and finally close the original issue with a note saying that it’s moved.
I’ve jotted down some example use cases. I’m pretty sure you’ll have others in mind too:
Docs: Let’s say, in the earlier days of your project people were adding the doc issues to the code repo. But now you have a website, with its own code and its own repo. So, you want to move the open doc issues from the code repo to the website repo. This is the situation I found myself in. The Issue Mover worked like a charm.
Community: At first, all your community-related requests were lumped together with doc issues. But now you have a large community that’s creating procedures and tools of its own. You create a shiny new community repo and you want to move the relevant issues into it.
Software components: Your app/framework is expanding rapidly, and it makes sense to split off separate code repos for some of the larger, less tightly-coupled components. Of course, the relevant issues should go along for the ride.
General and ongoing: People keep putting issues into the wrong repo! 😉 You like to keep things tidy, and want to move the issues to the logical place.
I was delighted to find this app, and I hope you find it useful too!
Disclaimer: Even though many of the contributors on the Issue Mover project work for Google (and so do I) this is not an official Google Product.
The next Write the Docs meetup in Sydney is just around the corner:
We have two presentations lined up, preceded by pizza and chatting!
- Michalina will talk about five steps to successful content strategy.
- I’ll follow with a presentation on doc fixits: What is a doc fixit (hint: a way of fixing doc bugs en masse), why would you want one, and what can you do with it once you have it?
Date, time, and location
Tuesday 3 July 2018, at 6pm. We aim to finish around 7.45pm.
At the Atlassian offices, 341 George St, Sydney.
Would you like to join us?
If you’re interested in technical documentation, you’re welcome! Sign up at the meetup and we’ll see you there.
When should we use one word, when should we use two, for terms like “log in”, “sign up”, “back up”, and the like? This is a hot topic among technical writers, UX writers, and any designers who use text in their products.
The question is particularly relevant in the software industry, but it affects other product areas too. For example, a gym may invite customers to an exercise class with wording like this:
We promise you a great workout
Work out with your friends and colleagues
How can we tell whether we should use one word or two?
Even if we ourselves already know the difference, how can we teach other people, like the engineers, designers, product managers, and other people who work on our product interfaces and documentation?
A presentation – a bit of fun with a serious goal
I’ve put together a presentation that explains a way to help ourselves and others decide when to use one word, when to use two. It’s a bit of fun, but with a serious goal.
You can find the presentation on SlideShare: One word or two? How to teach the difference between “login” and “log in”, and other mind-bogglingly important compound words.
This blog post contains some extracts from the presentation.
The presentation shows a couple of slides containing a few sentences. Embedded in the sentences are some strings of repeated letters, like lllll or bbbbb.
To play along, you’ll need to replace the string of letters with the terms “log in” or “back up”.
Try speaking the sentences in your head., or even saying them out loud. This is where the bit comes in about your partner needing to be in a good mood: you could even ask your partner to play along with you!
In the first slide, replace llllllll with “log in”
Here’s the first slide with letters for replacement – replace each series of lllll with “log in”. Don’t write anything down – just say the sentences in your head or out loud:
In the next slide – replace bbbbb with “back up”:
What’s the outcome?
Did you notice any pattern in the way you pronounced the words “login” and “log in”?
If you’re like me, your stress pattern in the middle sentence is different from the first and third sentences.
In the middle sentence, we give equal emphasis to both parts of the phrase: log in.
In the first and third sentences, we give greater emphasis to the first part of the phrase: login.
The stress patterns are the same for backup.
In the middle sentence, we give equal emphasis to both parts of the phrase: back up; log in.
In the first and third sentences, we give greater emphasis to the first part of the phrase: backup; login.
And it’s the middle sentence that uses two words, while the first and third use one word.
So, you can use stress patterns to decide whether to use one word or two.
That’s one way of doing things, but what’s the theory behind it?
The rules are something like this:
- If the phrase is acting as a noun, use one word. This includes cases when the phrase is used to qualify another noun.
- If it’s a verb, use two words.
The presentation goes into more detail and includes some sources and additional reading.
What about hyphens?
Yes, what about hyphens. I think this is my favourite slide, because it shows a pic of a Tawny Frogmouth. They’re the coolest birds ever.
I’ll leave you to read the rest in the presentation itself
The complete presentation is on SlideShare: One word or two? How to teach the difference between “login” and “log in”, and other mind-bogglingly important compound words.
(Note: This presentation is a prettified and updated version of my earlier blog post, published in April 2014. There’s a spider in that one.)
We’ve just announced the next Write the Docs meetup in Sydney:
What happens at the meetup
We currently have one speaker, Michalina, who will talk about five steps to successful content strategy.
There’ll be more speakers, and the opportunity to chat to old and new friends.
Who can attend?
If you’re interested in technical documentation, you’re welcome!
Date, time, and location
Tuesday 3 July 2018, at 6pm. We aim to finish around 7.30pm.
At the Atlassian offices, 341 George St, Sydney.
Want to air your ideas?
If you have an idea for a presentation or a lightning talk, let me know.